Examine the Movements of their Employees at Work Essay

Examine the Movements of their Employees at Work - Essay exerciseIt is this monitoring that has raised ethical issues causing detrimental effects to both employer and employee. Whereas employers justify their actions with the right to begin value from their employees and resources, employees turn over objected with the reasoning that their personal privacy is being unlawfully breached. Background Employee monitoring substructure be defined as the act of surveillance and monitoring employees actions during stipulated written reporting hours by workout of employer equipment (Stanton & Stam, 2006). It entails the use of computers to record, evaluate and observe an employees use of computer, plus communications worry web sites visited and emails sent or sure besides telephone calls made. However, it is legal for employers to use computer programs to monitor employees (Duquenoy, Jones & Blundell, 2008). Employee surveillance has gained prominence as a prerequisite and in the same breath a contentious issue due to the complexity and public use of technology at the work place. Employers are worried with employees proper behavior and conformity to work related regulations. Hence some critics believe employee monitoring is an inalienable responsibility. To others it is an invasion to privacy. Managers employ different ways of monitoring employees internet use, emails and their location to capitalize on employee productivity, uphold the integrity of the firm and to defend the fill of clientele and work mates (Duquenoy, Jones & Blundell, 2008). When managers start to probe into employees private life, mistrust and acrimony are create between employees and managers. Many workers have lost their employment and a lot more(prenominal) companies have had to pillowcase lawsuits filed against them because people believe that the use of internal company communications should remain confidential (Bassick, 2007). Managers and owners of private firms have had several r easons to scrutinize the activities of their employees. Some are driven by the displeasure when employees misuse company cash and waste time to act out non-work related tasks. Others would want to confirm any suspicion of criminal, double-faced or unwanted conduct by their employees observe application of safety and health regulations make trusted to compliance of internal employment policies verify the quality of work done protect staff from curse or unjust treatment in the office and so forth (Lane, 2003). Managers base their actions on the nates that they have a right to examine employee productivity and to guard against fraud and theft. This will ultimately stretch forth to employee monitoring (Lane, 2003). Some of the areas prone to abuse in the work places include use of company resources like vehicles, technology adapted at workplace like electronic communication, and adherence to acceptable working hours. In this report, I will review employee monitoring on their use of electronic communication at the workplace, more so the ethical dilemma facing managers and employees. Hence the questions of how far should managers go to examine employee movements? With the arrival of advance technological capabilities, many professional and personal tasks are becoming quicker and more convenient to carry out. For instance, email has been viewed as a convenient substitute to making telephone calls because it is perceived as private. In the real sense it is public because it leaves a record long after it has been deleted (Bassick, 2007). Thus a ball-hawking person can easily retrieve it from a networked communication system.